Small & mid-size businesses · Enterprise divisions
The same team, sized to you.
A business with no IT department and a division inside a large company need different things around the build: who signs off, which systems it plugs into, what paperwork it has to clear. The build itself is the same — a CTO, an architect and engineers putting AI to work on how you actually operate.
What changes with size
The room, the systems and the sign-off.
One owner, or a chain of approvers
In a smaller business the owner or general manager decides in a meeting, and our retained CTO is often the only technical lead you have. In an enterprise division the division head sponsors the work, and central IT, security and architecture review each get a say. We work with whoever holds the decision.
Your SaaS stack, or someone else's platform
A smaller business usually runs on off-the-shelf tools — accounting, CRM, email, a shared drive — and we build on those rather than adding more. A division plugs into platforms another team owns: single sign-on, the data warehouse, the ERP, change windows. We build to their standards, not around them.
A short scope, or a full vendor file
For a smaller business, a written scope and acceptance criteria are enough to start. For a division, there is a security questionnaire, vendor onboarding and an architecture review first. We prepare what those processes ask for, so the work is not stalled waiting on us.
Something you can run, or something IT will accept
A smaller business gets a setup that runs without a technical hire, and we maintain it or hand it to whoever you bring on later. A division gets runbooks, monitoring and documentation in the form its central IT team requires before it takes ownership.
What does not change
How we build, at any size.
Start narrow, prove it, then widen
Whether you are an independent firm or a business unit inside a much larger one, the first build is a single workflow with a written scope and acceptance criteria. Nothing about the first step commits you to the next.
Your tenancy, your code
Systems are built in your own cloud accounts, not ours. You own the code, the repositories and the documentation, and nothing you give us is used to train someone else's model.
A person approves what matters
AI drafts, sorts and retrieves. Anything that goes to a customer, commits money or changes a record is reviewed by a named person on your side, and every output is logged with its sources.
Take one layer, or all three
A retained CTO, a chief architect and embedded engineers. A smaller business often takes all three; a division with its own architects may take only engineers. Either way, you hire nobody.
How it starts
Small, written down, and reversible.
Every step below ends in a document you keep, and none of them commits you to the next.
A working session
Where the repetitive load sits, which systems hold the data, and who needs to approve what. For a division, that includes the review steps central IT and security will want to see.
One scoped build
A single workflow — intake, document generation, search over your own knowledge, a report nobody wants to assemble by hand — shipped against the acceptance criteria you signed off.
Retained CTO or embedded engineers
Ongoing ownership if you want it: architecture, vendor decisions and maintenance, handed back to your own people whenever you are ready.
Start with a conversation